Hammer I am
3:57 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
El scorch I see your point but she thought they were all innocent,
She might have come to the conclusion Jaz was trying to just boost his split taking a gamble he could get her to vote harry because following your logic it makes it almost a certainty it's him.
I mean she did put Harry's name first so I think a lot was cut in the edit for her to almost vote harry, she probably saw your logic too
|
El Scorchio
3:23 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
Willtell 12:20
No. Because there was zero chance of Molly at that stage doing anything other than what Harry told her because she was so gullible. So Andrew was fucked every which way because Harry was always going to fuck him over when it got down to three and Molly would 100% side with Harry in any 3 person scenario even if it wasn’t logical- as she proved in the end by ignoring all the obvious evidence, to make the wrong choice.
|
El Scorchio
3:20 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
Hammer I am 12:03
Because if Jaz was the only traitor then he wouldn’t throw red as he’d know the others were faithful and he’d have nothing to gain and everything to lose by throwing red as if he throws green he wins right there. After she’s seen what they’ve all done there’s no possible scenario where Jaz is a traitor and Harry is faithful.
Therefore they are either both traitors or just Harry is. In which case she has to vote Harry off as if she votes Jaz off she loses 100% of the time but voting Harry off gives her a 50/50 chance.
The only other option is they are all faithful but even then you have to side with Jaz because then if he really doesn’t know it means that he has to be faithful whereas there is only a 50/50 chance of Harry being faithful or not so again you have to go with Jaz for 100% chance of winning the money vs only a 50/50 chance of winning if you go with Harry.
But she was too stupid to think it through because she fancied Harry. It was annoying she couldn’t grasp what was right in front of her face but it was worth it for how utterly gutted she was when she realised what a chump she is.
|
Willtell
12:20 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
I can’t help feel that at the last four stage, Andrew blew his chances because of his distrust of Harry.
He and Harry could have voted out Jazz and shared the prize leaving ‘faithful’ Mollie in with them. She probably would have backed Harry had they gone for another vote but she might also have backed Andrew so would they have stopped there?
|
Hammer I am
12:03 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
What do you mean?
She would have already handed in her bag when she was his red vote . In the writing bit She would have won if he was the traitor and harry was innocent
|
El Scorchio
6:52 Sun Jan 28
Re: The Traitors
|
Mollie- what an absolute fuckwit. As soon as Jaz threw red, logically the only correct thing to do to not lose was to vote out Harry regardless.
|
Mr Anon
2:32 Sat Jan 27
Re: The Traitors
|
*or say they are traitor during game
|
Mr Anon
2:31 Sat Jan 27
Re: The Traitors
|
My old friend from university is executive producer, been pestering him for some of the questions here, Paul wasn't a plant, as far as he's aware he's been in deal or no deal and that's about it, they're very careful with recruitment but they absolutely knew he would be a great game player, some are picked as wolves and some sheep.
Also yes they sign certain rules, they obviously can't just bluet out who the traitors are on banishing, it say they are a traitor. The crew are also kept very much distant from contestants as would be easy to make an error which could result in a rerun
|
Alfs
2:38 Sat Jan 27
Re: The Traitors
|
Russ - that could happen but confidentiality contracts and NDAs and would have been signed with many rules in place. Breaking that contract could lead to the contestant being liable for the costs of the program being re-shot.
The Traitors isn't live either, so can be edited.
Brilliant ending tonight!
|
Russ of the BML
12:10 Fri Jan 26
Re: The Traitors
|
Alfs 2:37 Fri Jan 26
Me and the missus have said that the producers rely heavily in the contestants keeping schtum. I mean, at any time any one of them could literally ruin the whole show by saying who the traitors are. In some situations, they've almost done so by insisting who they are.
But I assume they are under heavy contractual rules to say that they will be sued if they ruin it?
|
Alfs
2:37 Fri Jan 26
Re: The Traitors
|
Colly - These shows have very strict rules and if a Prod Co manipulated any of the game play they'd be fined millions and their reputation ruined.
It was a simple coincidence.
Harry's played a blinder and I think he'll win it.
|
collyrob
12:40 Fri Jan 26
Re: The Traitors
|
I find that sword part very contrived.
It just happened to be him, it just happened to be the last contestant to attempt, and he just happened to pick the correct sword.
|
El Scorchio
6:51 Mon Jan 22
Re: The Traitors
|
I think you're right- he's got this friendly almost village idiot vibe going on where he seems too straightforward to be a traitor.
I think the way Harry laid into Paul will be what comes back to bite him. I think it was noted by a couple of them how weird that he was so clinical laser focused and aggressive out of nowhere when he went at him with all the evidence round the table.
|
Russ of the BML
5:46 Mon Jan 22
Re: The Traitors
|
El Scorchio 4:42 Mon Jan 22
I think Andrew's got a chance now as he's been recruited and as you say Harry's confidence is going to undo him and I think Andrew could suddenly find himself right on the verge of winning it. Nobody suspects him.
|
El Scorchio
4:42 Mon Jan 22
Re: The Traitors
|
And she's gone too. Gutting.
bad week losing Paul and then her. Zack and Ross are really the only two interesting ones left. The rest of the faithful are all so boring apart from Jaz.
I want Zack to win as he's absolutely the ugly duckling/underdog and I'd love Ross to get Harry killed.
Harry is playing well but he's a smug little cunt who is too big for his boots and he needs to go. It's mad (like Paul when it took so long) that no-one has cottoned on to him yet.
|
Bouncing Ludo
12:52 Fri Jan 19
Re: The Traitors
|
Charlotte has a wife. What a waste.
|
El Scorchio
6:52 Thu Jan 18
Re: The Traitors
|
Russ of the BML 6:10
Tell me about it! It's a distraction at the round table bits too
|
El Scorchio
6:51 Thu Jan 18
Re: The Traitors
|
Jaan Kenbrovin 2:47
It was a parlour game and a card game long before Among Us also borrowed the concept in the same way the TV show does.
|
Russ of the BML
6:10 Thu Jan 18
Re: The Traitors
|
El Scorchio 1:41 Thu Jan 18
Indeed. I am having to quell my gasps and phwoars when Charlotte walks on. An absolute belter of a rack.
|
Russ of the BML
6:07 Thu Jan 18
Re: The Traitors
|
Jaan Kenbrovin 2:47 Thu Jan 18
Well, OK.... It's an original TV concept.
|
peckham massive
3:10 Thu Jan 18
Re: The Traitors
|
It's almost identical to a card game called Werewolves of Miller's Hollow which I have too.
|
| 
